Quantcast
CUNARD

Captain Ian McNaught
On Cunard Yesterday
and Today

by Richard H. Wagner
  Captain Ian McNaught is most often associated with the legendary
Queen Elizabeth 2.  He was the youngest Cunard captain ever to command
her and was her last captain before she left Cunard in 2008.  However,
Captain McNaught has been with Cunard Line since 1987. During his
career he served on other Cunard ships besides QE2 and was a witness to
this transformational period in the 170 year history of the line.  
   The flagship of Cunard Line during the last part of the 20th Century was
QE2. “QE2 was a unique ship of the 60s, a spectacular ship, a fantastic
ship with a huge following.”  For most of the year during the period 1969 to
2004, she did transatlantic crossings interspersed with cruises out of New
York or Southampton.  Most winters, she did a world cruise of three
months duration.  
   While QE2 was indisputably what kept Cunard alive during this period,
there was also another side of Cunard that is often overlooked.  On the
premise that there was only enough demand for one ship to do regularly
scheduled transatlantic crossings, Cunard moved to branch out into
cruising.  Its first foray bore no relation to Cunard’s traditional service or to
QE2.  
   “The Countess, the Princess and the Adventurer - -  they were real cruise
ships.  They were very small ships that made no claims whatsoever to be
luxurious in any way shape or form.  They were, in their day, the British
package holiday at sea.  That was their purpose and they were fun ships.   
People went there and had a fun time.  They were fairly inexpensive
holidays.  It got people into cruising and after that, a lot of those people
said ‘Oh, I’m going to go and try the QE2’  It got the younger market into
cruising.  So, they served their purpose very well.  And here we are 2009,
and the Cunard Countess and the Cunard Princess are still going in their
respective areas.  Yes, with different funnel colors on but there they are,
they are still going around.  Good little ships.”
   At the other end of the spectrum were two yacht-like ships, the Sea
Goddess I and Sea Goddess II. “They were wonderful, super little ships.  
One hundred passengers, 94 crew, the level of service was amazing.  I think
what made them popular was they were very relaxed ships.  We didn’t have
Bingo at three o’clock and you didn’t have bridge sessions and all this sort
of thing.  It was a very relaxed, easy-going sort of product for very wealthy
people who basically wanted to come and switch off for a week and just
chill out for a week.”
   “Very high quality service, very high quality food - - if you wanted to
have caviar and chips at three o’clock in the morning, you could have
caviar and chips at three o’clock in the morning. It was that sort of market.  
It was an all-inclusive product so people never came on and worried about
paying for things - - it took that undignified experience away, you never had
to sign a check.  You just came on and relaxed and enjoyed the product.”
   “We spent the summer working out of Monte Carlo, St. Tropez, the little
Greek islands that the big ships can’t go to.  Everywhere you went, you felt
quite exclusive.  In the winter months, when I was on Sea Goddess II, we
used to go out through Suez, out through all the little islands in the Indian
Ocean, down through Java and then we spent our winter working up and
down the Australian bite into the Great Barrier Reef.  In a little ship, just 99
meters long, you could go to some places that are just out of this world
where nobody else can go.”
   “It was a very relaxed product, a very unique product and I really
enjoyed.  Of course, those ships are still going in the shape of Sea Dream I
and Sea Dream II - - still being very successful.”
   While the individual component parts of Cunard were good, there was no
unifying theme or concept underlying the brand. “When you think about it,
we had: NAL [i.e. Norwegian American Line] in the shape of the Vistafjord
and the Sagafjord; then we had QE2; then we had the two little Sea
Goddesses; [the various mass market cruise ships] and then of course, the
Royal Viking Sun came along, so we had this very eclectic group of ships.”
   At the same time, there were a series of management changes that
resulted in the line moving in one direction one year and then reversing
course shortly thereafter.  “I think for many years, to be honest, that ship [i.
e, QE2] sailed because of the crew onboard and despite the management.”
   In 1998, it was announced that Cunard was being purchased by Carnival
Corporation, which had had its early roots in the mass market end of the
industry.   “I remember when Carnival came along, there were a lot of
people who said ‘oh, this is the end’ but actually, Carnival coming along
was the best thing that ever happened to us because it re-focused the
product.  Here, we are now, we had QE2, then Queen Mary 2 came along
as the new transatlantic superliner, and here we are now with Queen
Victoria and a sister ship coming along, Queen Elizabeth.  The product is
very focused now.  You step on a Cunard ship and you know exactly what
you are going to get.  So, I think Carnival coming along, having the right
vision for us from [Carnival CEO] Micky Arison and through Pam Conover
[the first President of Cunard after the acquisition] was one of the best
things that ever happened to us in Cunard, definitely.   The proof of it is
here, we are sitting in it [referring to his current command, Queen
Victoria].   It has worked so we have a lot to thank Micky Arison and Pam
Conover for I think for sewing the seeds and setting it all off.”
   Today, Cunard Line is within the management structure of Carnival U.K.
under the overall Carnival Corporation umbrella.  Sharing this structure
with Cunard is sister company, P&O Cruises.  “They like us, have a very
long history and a very huge sense of tradition.  But, of course, their market
from day one was very different than our market from day one.  They were
providing a service to take [British people] out to the Far East and
eventually out to Australia.  Their route and their type of passenger carry
required a different type of service to our service which was predominantly
a transatlantic service.”
   “Very different beasts doing very different jobs   Cunard did one job and
they did it very well, catering very much to an international market,
predominantly British and American, and providing a means of transport
from getting from A to B.  The P&O fleet provided a means of transport for
military, civil service type people, business people who were working out
on that route out to Australia. Then, after World War II, in the 50s and into
the 60s, they provided carriage for British emigrants who were going out to
Australia and New Zealand.  As those days changed they sort of moved
into the cruise market, if you like.  If you look through the history, you see
the nature of their ships change to provide those different types of services.”
   “But they have kept their traditions such as the Pakistani and Indian crew
that they have onboard.  Their uniforms are different than ours.  All these
little things are defined by tradition.  When you look around the décor in
their ships, it is a very different décor than the type of décor that we have.  
So, all those traditions are still there and quite rightly so.  As we are they
should be very proud of their heritage and what has given us the
wherewithal to make us what we are today.”
   Both lines remain distinctly British.  But because of the difference in
heritage, with P&O have served predominantly British passengers over the
years and Cunard having served a mix of international passengers, the style
of each line is different.  “You look at the way their ships are decorated
and laid out, it is very much British for the British whereas this is
international Britain if you like.”
    Captain McNaught sees Carnival U.K. maintaining the distinction
between the two lines.  “P&O and Cunard, although they are under the
same management umbrella will still carry very different identities. The
identity of the ships will be very different because Cunard is one product
and P&O is another product and they want to keep that difference because
that does sell better” inasmuch as the two lines appeal to different segments
of the market. “They are covering the whole of the UK market within the
Carnival UK brand.”
Captain Ian McNaught (Photo
courtesy of E. DeLaney)
CLICK ON PHOTOS FOR
LARGER VIEWS
There are more photos and
information about Queen
Victoria on the Queen
Victoria Profile Page
Above:  Sea Dream I, the former Sea
Goddess I.
Cruise interview - - Cunard Line - - Captain Ian McNaught - Part II
Captain McNaught has also commanded
P&O's Artemis
Cunard Countess
CLICK HERE FOR PART I OF OUR
INTERVIEW WITH CAPTAIN MCNAUGHT
BEYONDSHIPS HOME

CRUISE SHIP CENTRAL

CRUISE SHIP PROFILES

CRUISE LINKS

CUNARD PAGE

QUEEN ELIZABETH PROFILE

QUEEN MARY 2 PROFILE

QUEEN VICTORIA PROFILE

QUEEN ELIZABETH 2 PROFILE
QUEEN
VICTORIA